[Standards] Authentication via XMPP (Concern over XEP-70)

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Guenther Niess wrote:

> I don't agree with your all details, but in the end I agree with the 
> statement that there are all attempts to fix a hole in the design of
> the XEP and it's much better to fix this hole with a better workflow.
> 
> I don't have any doubts against that workflow so in my opinion it 
> should be prepaired as a XEP to displace the existing XEP 70.
> But the requirement of a configured system and that the user have to
> be online with his XMPP account is one of the reasons to think that
> the proposition of Andres with the HTTP Digest Auth (like OpenID) way
> have also a right to exist and should be prepaired. 

Right. We're slowly getting to the point where we have consensus about 
what to fix. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080109/664dfc6d/attachment-0001.bin