[Standards] XEP-0115 redux

[Zenon Kuder]

Dne Wednesday 16 of January 2008 00:58:17 Rachel Blackman napsal(a):
> > However, we could opt to stuff that information into the caps
> > element anyway,
> > just to save ourselves from having to transmit another element/xmlns:
>
>
> I DO agree putting client info like this into presence is a big gain,
> since if it's there, you just use it, and if it's not there, you
> assume the client does not want to offer it and do not go around
> mucking up the network with floods of queries.  But it's not
> conceptually really tied to 'capabilities,' and arguably stuffing it
> into XEP-0115 makes the XEP try to solve too many usage cases.
> Conversely, as noted, the only gain from keeping this tied into
> XEP-0115 is the saving of a couple of bytes.