[Standards] urn:xmpp:tmp:*

Rachel Blackman rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Tue Jan 29 14:29:37 CST 2008


> Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
>> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>> On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> urn:xmpp:tmp:foo
>>> +1.  Love it.
>> Yeah, I wanted to suggest something like this, too.
>
> It makes the XEP Editor's life much easier when a spec advances to  
> Draft:
>
> s/urn:xmpp:tmp/urn:xmpp/g
>
> And I'm +1 to anything that makes the XEP Editor's life easier...

I also like this idea, though my one suggestion from a code standpoint  
is that if it's 'urn:xmpp:foo:tmp' you can write code to watch  
for :tmp on the end of namespaces and handle things cleanly (and with  
less code!) during the transitional period between EXPERIMENTAL and  
DRAFT status specifications.

That said, I know urn:xmpp:tmp:foo is a more strictly 'proper'  
hierarchy, so I don't particularly care about the order that much.

So +1 in general, with one offhanded comment. :)

-- 
Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillianastra.com/




More information about the Standards mailing list