[Standards] Jingle "implementability"

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
> 
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Why is it not possible for a plugin to register for Jingle-related
>> events based on the application type? Once a plugin receives such an
>> event, it can then register for Jingle-related events based on the
>> session ID. So for example if a session starts out as a voice chat but
>> one of the parties adds video via a content-modify, the video plugin can
>> learn of the content-modify, flag the session as now of interest based
>> on the session ID, and register for events related to that session. I
>> freely admit that I'm not a client developer, but that approach seems
>> eminently reasonable to me.
> 
> It requires that the app maintain a state for which session-id's are
> associated with each plug-in. Doable, but fragile.

So what exactly do you propose to overcome this hurdle? I didn't quite
grok your previous suggestion.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080131/402e965d/attachment.bin