[Standards] About posting new topics to the same thread
js-xmpp-standards at webkeks.org
Sat Nov 1 04:05:31 CDT 2008
Am 31.10.2008 um 23:38 schrieb Brett Zamir:
> Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> Oh, and if we're already at it, you should stop using TOFU,
>> which is considered very impolite on mailing lists.
>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOFU#Top-posting
> I personally strongly dislike bottom-posting, and the Wikipedia
> article you cite also indicates there are preference differences out
> there, including within mailing lists.
- If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context. This will make sure
readers understand when they start to read your response. Since
NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings from
one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
include the entire original!
So there *IS* a standard for mailing lists. The Wikipedia article also
states that this is the netiquette.
> But instead of getting into a fruitless argument about what we think
> is the "right" way, how about we consider some way to solve the
> problem? Given that we already have the benefit of a formal
> hierarchical structure within XMPP via XML, how about a namespaced
> child of <message type=normal> (too late for <body>) to keep track
> of hierarchical content within a posting, which besides enabling
> posting order display to differ by user preference, would also more
> easily enable scripting to collapse or navigate a section of
> quotations, differentially auto-color replies from particular users
> or levels, etc.? Perhaps even XHTML-IM (XEP 0071) could be
> overloaded for such a purpose via <blockquote>'s @cite attribute
> (which could use an XMPP URI or email URI to indicate authorship)
> and/or the @class attribute (e.g., to distinguish citations from the
> "inner thread" from those outside of its context).
We're using e-mail here, not XMPP :).
> For that matter, how about some mechanisms to enable forking of
> threads, even within a post? (along the lines of, and potentially
> supporting, wikis, discussion forums, blogs, versioning systems,
> etc., since, to my mind, these all should all only be slightly
> different in terms of protocol syntax so that one can easily treat
> one as (or convert one to) the other, as there is a lot of albeit
> inadequate convergence between them already). (Sorry I am not too
> well-informed on all of the numerous specs you all have marvelously
> already put out there, so my apologies to whatever extent this
> covers ground already covered.)
Then we'd need to switch mailing lists to XMPP. Would be a use
scenario for PubSub :).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20081101/72de05d4/attachment.pgp
More information about the Standards