[Standards] C2C TLS

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Am 24.11.2008 um 19:40 schrieb Dave Cridland:

> For the crypto layer, any TLS library. These include OpenSSL, GNU  
> TLS, as well as numerous others.

Aha, so no client implementing C2C TLS at all, I see.

> For the C2C TLS protocol itself, this is just <starttls/> over a C2C  
> XMPP session - are you saying that Gajim won't use TLS on a link  
> local session if offered? If not, why not? If so, why does this not  
> count?

Aha, so you count it as an implementation if there is no negotiaion  
etc? Interesting! You count having nothing as having a full  
implementation. Indeed, really interesting!

> You know the answers to the remainder of your questions, or else can  
> look them up in the archives.

So nothing changed, all is still like it was before, like I predicted  
half a year before? So C2C TLS is dead before it was ever used - no  
client going to implement it properly etc? Now please tell me how  
having nothing is better than ESessions. You already admitted that  
there's currently nothing.

--
Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20081125/d4ab5e77/attachment-0001.pgp