[Standards] -198, was Re: Namespaces, specifications, and protocol life cycles

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Tue Sep 9 16:54:34 UTC 2008

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Dirk Meyer <dmeyer at tzi.de> wrote:
> you wrote about XEP-0198 and that
> is more complicated. IMHO it is a MUST HAVE extension and I will
> implement it as soon as I can, but I have no server to test it
> with. And the same is true for server developer: they have no
> client.

At least in the 198 case, server implementations can test against
themselves, while clients require the server, so it's possible to
bootstrap things.


More information about the Standards mailing list