[Standards] [E2E] Why we need a <body> element

Jonathan Schleifer js-xmpp-standards at webkeks.org
Tue Sep 30 15:05:39 UTC 2008

Am 30.09.2008 um 16:56 schrieb Remko Tronçon:

> 'Using Jingle in-band?'. I may have missed most of the discussion, but
> using Jingle if you already know the transport doesn't sound like what
> was intended? I was under the impression that we would use Jingle to
> negotiate a transport, which *could* be IBB as a fallback in the worst
> case, but could (preferably) also be an OOB method.

Last time, a few suggested IBB for text-only, which I think is a good  
idea, since OOB is a privacy issue. We'll get the situation ICQ had in  
the beginning then. We didn't make the mistake ICQ did back then, why  
do we want to make that mistake now?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080930/1b2b0e35/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list