[Standards] Wording JID, FullJid, baseJID,...
Pedro Melo
melo at simplicidade.org
Mon Jun 22 07:30:13 CDT 2009
Hi,
On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
> I'm looking for correct wording:
>
> romeo
> @example
> .com // JID or
> BaseJID or?
Bare JID
> romeo at example.com/
> home // FullJID or JID?
FullJID. JID might be acceptable but I would recommend that you use
either full or bare.
> romeo
> // username
Node identifier.
In some contexts username might be appropriate.
> home
> // resource
yes. More specifically, resource identifier.
> example
> .com
> // host
> name?
domain identifier or just domain.
> conference
> .example.com //
> host name?
domain identifier or just domain.
> <iq from="pubsub.example.com" node="something"> // jid+node
Not sure what you mean here. This is not even a valid stanza. There is
no "node" in the top level <iq />
> room at conference.example.com //
> room jid?
In the context of a MUC service, yes.
> room at conference.example.com/niki //
> room jid?
No, in the context of the MUC spec, this is a participant JID.
> Is that specified in the XMPP standards?
Yes, start here: http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3920.html#addressing
> -----
> What means "IQ"?
Maybe peter can answer that, I don't remember anymore...
> What's the big difference between IQ and MESSAGE?
IQ is a request-response mechanism, message is fire-and-forget. Thats
the most basic difference. As you walk up the protocol stack there
will be others (routing is handled differently, etc).
> PS: I'm teaching that things and must be very correct.
May I suggest that you purchase a copy of the XMPP book? Not
affiliated, just a happy customer:
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521264/
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: melo at simplicidade.org
Use XMPP!
More information about the Standards
mailing list