[webteam] vendor lock-in, what the .... is it?

[Florian Jensen]

Kevin Smith wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly with abolishing the evil field, but it does
> server a purpose. I propose having the opposite, which is to have an
> 'arbitrary server' field, which most clients will tick (someone else
> will have a better suggestion for the name, I suspect), because it's
> true that there's no point deciding that this GTalk client sounds
> great if your account is on jabber.ex.ac.uk :)
>
> /K
+1

Florian Jensen