[webteam] vendor lock-in, what the .... is it?

[Robert Martinez]

Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2007, at 20:36, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
>> I propose we abolish the field entirely.  All in favor?
>
> I agree wholeheartedly with abolishing the evil field, but it does 
> server a purpose. I propose having the opposite, which is to have an 
> 'arbitrary server' field, which most clients will tick (someone else 
> will have a better suggestion for the name, I suspect), because it's 
> true that there's no point deciding that this GTalk client sounds 
> great if your account is on jabber.ex.ac.uk :)
>
> /K
>
>
That would be ok for me.
what should be the name for the field then?