[webteam] Screenshots on Client Page

[Sander Devrieze]

2008/3/2, Susan Stewart <HedgeMage at binaryredneck.net>:
>  I think we are talking about different things, Sander.  Your argument
>  seems to be "Gallery2 is really cool, so we should use it".

My argument was/is "We have a good experience with Gallery2 at
coccinella.im and it might be worth looking at for jabber.org too...no
discussion needed."

>  On that score, I'm not yet convinced that we even need image.module...
>  we'll see what happens as the conversation goes on.  The biggest danger
>  of transparent development for this type of site is scope creep.  It is
>  tempting to just hang another module, feature, or content section on
>  every time someone has an idea, until the whole project topples over.
>  We can't do that and have a functional, maintainable site.

To get maybe a bit harsh; I really don't like this endless "government
style" arguing about whether or not a feature is needed. I prefer the
"business style" way to actually *do* things instead of long
discussions that lead nowhere. With just *doing* things and then
fixing bugs you introduced this way the website will have a bigger
organic growth than with endless discussions. Ok, that was another
point I wanted to make...there is no need to discuss about this
whether or not you agree or not...reason: discussing about this has no
value at all for the jabber.org website :-)

-- 
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.