[xmppwg] Re: Fw: [Simple] "last call" on SIMPLE-XMPP interworking I-D

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Adam Roach wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I'm saying that XMPP does have what you want, but in order to enforce
>> that, on the XMPP end of the wormhole the gateway would need to mimic
>> short-lived SIP subscription semantics rather than long-lived XMPP
>> subscription semantics.
>>   
> 
> Okay; let's do that, then.

Would you prefer it to be a (1) a MUST or (2) a SHOULD with a proviso in
 all caps saying that if you decide to be nice to XMPP clients at the
deployment level then you open up a possible amplification attack (see
the security considerations) and be aware that SIP presence servers
might not refuse to talk with you blah blah blah?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/xmppwg/attachments/20060711/9be77496/smime.bin