I'm possibly reading more into this statement than you
intended, but in general we want to only bump the namespace
where incompatibilities would otherwise arrive undetected. So
no namespace bump unless we absolutely have to, but if we have
to, we absolutely do it.
Of note here is that adding elements and attributes is
normally not a reason to bump the namespace, though
traditional XML rules would indicate we should - clients and
servers typically just ignore XML stuff they don't understand.
my misunderstanding! thanks for pointing this out.
On 2025-06-30 03:49, Dave Cridland
wrote:
I'm possibly reading more into this statement than you
intended, but in general we want to only bump the namespace
where incompatibilities would otherwise arrive undetected. So no
namespace bump unless we absolutely have to, but if we have to,
we absolutely do it.
Of note here is that adding elements and attributes is
normally not a reason to bump the namespace, though traditional
XML rules would indicate we should - clients and servers
typically just ignore XML stuff they don't understand.