On 7/8/24 19:58, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 7/5/24 8:31 AM, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> XEP-0045 Multi-User Chat, section 9.2 defines that the ban list is
>> always based on a user's bare JID (in the first paragraph).
>>
>> That same section also defines a matching order (in the last
>> paragraph) in which items with a full JID are explicitly included.
>>
>> This seems to contradict each other. Am I misunderstanding this part
>> of the specification?
>>
>> Assuming that full JID values aren't to be used on a ban-list, should
>> the matching order as defined in the XEP be modified to not refer to
>> full JIDs?
>
> Hallo Guus,
>
> I suspect the spec originally said that matching is done on the basis
> of a bare JID <user@domain> and then we tried to align the matching
> with Privacy Lists / XEP-0016.
>
> In practice I don't know if MUC implementations allow banning based on
> a domain, but in theory that could be a helpful feature (e.g., to
> block arbitrary accounts from rogue servers). However, to avoid
> confusion I would suggest that banning not take account of the
> resourcepart.
>
> Peter
>
Hey,


I know that at least Gajim Allows you to block by Domain.

That is i can go to group chat settings -> outcasts and I can write a
domain like 'conversations.im'

then it will ban all users from that domain that already joined and
reject any new ones from joining.

I know because I have used it this way before :)


MSavoritias

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave@xmpp.org