[Council] JEP question
dwaite at jabber.com
Tue Aug 7 12:36:39 CDT 2001
I am curious what others think - should proposals be limited to using
'draft' namespaces different than their final namespace?
For instance, I have been working on a new conferencing protocol for
quite some time (see http://jabber.org/?oid=1538), which currently
specifies that it uses the jabber:iq:conference and jabber:x:invite
namespaces - should it instead declare its own namespaces and have the
namespaces used switch when/if it is formally accepted?
More information about the Council