[Council] Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president

Julian Missig julian at aspect.net
Thu Jun 28 18:10:38 CDT 2001


I would like to also be on Standards Compliance, assuming I have the time. I have 
quite a bit of interest in that.

Julian

---- Original Message ----
From:		Jeremie
Date:		Thu 6/28/01 17:27
To:		members at jabber.org
Cc:		council at jabber.org
Subject:	Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president


> yeah, have the council members voted on the JIGs yet? Come on :)

Tomorrow we vote, tonight stpeter is finishing up the JEP
docbook-derivative format.

On the inital JIGs, here's who I'm guessing will be initially
participating:

*) Generic Conferencing
	- Dave Waite
	- ***

*) File Transfer/OOB
	- Jeremie
	- ***

*) Security
	- Thomas Muldowney
	- ***

*) Standards Compliance
	- Michael Bauer
	- ***

*) Text Formatting
	- Julian Missig
	- ***

*) Browsing
	- Ryan Eatmon
	- Jeremie
	- Peter Millard

*) Presence Management
	- ***

*) Routing/Streams
	- Dave Smith
	- ***

*) --- any more can be proposed next week using the JEP format and
process

What I'd like to see is at least one or two more names wherever there are
***'s (email me or the list), but only if you're planning on being a major
contributor to that JIG.  If you just want to participate, I'll be setting
up lists, etc, for each JIG this weekend.

The fun commences :)

Jer



> 
> ---- Original Message ----
> From:		DJ Adams
> Date:		Thu 6/28/01 16:46
> To:		members at jabber.org
> Subject:	Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Bill Abbas wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 June 2001 11:37, Jay Lorenzo wrote:
> > > ultimately, the credibility of the
> > > Foundation will be determined by the actions it takes.
> > 
> > This is it in a nutshell.  
> 
> May I expand upon this and say just this:
> 
> for goodness sake, I'd really like to get past this theoretical
> discussion and get on with the real business of the Foundation.
> If things do turn out to be wrongly balanced, wrongly voted, 
> wrongly whatever, then we can fix it at the time. 
> 
> No offence intended to anyone :-)
> 
> dj
> chomping at the bit(s)
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 

_______________________________________________
Members mailing list
Members at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members




More information about the Council mailing list