[Council] Re: jabber.com for president

Terry Smelser tsmelser at sltscommunications.net
Thu Jun 28 17:16:06 CDT 2001


Put me on the list for this also.


Julian Missig writes:

> I would like to also be on Standards Compliance, assuming I have the time. I have 
> quite a bit of interest in that.
> 
> Julian
> 
> ---- Original Message ----
> From:		Jeremie
> Date:		Thu 6/28/01 17:27
> To:		members at jabber.org
> Cc:		council at jabber.org
> Subject:	Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president
> 
> 
> > yeah, have the council members voted on the JIGs yet? Come on :)
> 
> Tomorrow we vote, tonight stpeter is finishing up the JEP
> docbook-derivative format.
> 
> On the inital JIGs, here's who I'm guessing will be initially
> participating:
> 
> *) Generic Conferencing
> 	- Dave Waite
> 	- ***
> 
> *) File Transfer/OOB
> 	- Jeremie
> 	- ***
> 
> *) Security
> 	- Thomas Muldowney
> 	- ***
> 
> *) Standards Compliance
> 	- Michael Bauer
> 	- ***
> 
> *) Text Formatting
> 	- Julian Missig
> 	- ***
> 
> *) Browsing
> 	- Ryan Eatmon
> 	- Jeremie
> 	- Peter Millard
> 
> *) Presence Management
> 	- ***
> 
> *) Routing/Streams
> 	- Dave Smith
> 	- ***
> 
> *) --- any more can be proposed next week using the JEP format and
> process
> 
> What I'd like to see is at least one or two more names wherever there are
> ***'s (email me or the list), but only if you're planning on being a major
> contributor to that JIG.  If you just want to participate, I'll be setting
> up lists, etc, for each JIG this weekend.
> 
> The fun commences :)
> 
> Jer
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > ---- Original Message ----
> > From:		DJ Adams
> > Date:		Thu 6/28/01 16:46
> > To:		members at jabber.org
> > Subject:	Re: [Foundation] jabber.com for president
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Bill Abbas wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 June 2001 11:37, Jay Lorenzo wrote:
> > > > ultimately, the credibility of the
> > > > Foundation will be determined by the actions it takes.
> > > 
> > > This is it in a nutshell.  
> > 
> > May I expand upon this and say just this:
> > 
> > for goodness sake, I'd really like to get past this theoretical
> > discussion and get on with the real business of the Foundation.
> > If things do turn out to be wrongly balanced, wrongly voted, 
> > wrongly whatever, then we can fix it at the time. 
> > 
> > No offence intended to anyone :-)
> > 
> > dj
> > chomping at the bit(s)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members



More information about the Council mailing list