[Council] VOTE: JEP-0011

Julian Missig julian at jabber.org
Thu Apr 4 10:45:29 CST 2002


Why? It got a -1 vote. It was rejected.

Wing, Oliver wrote:

>Surely, the JEP should go as presented, and then a 'revision' with the new
>proposed category, and any other changes should go through the standards-jig
>before being passed to the Council? It seems somewhat unfair to make changes
>at such a late stage without consulting the Jabber community at large,
>especially as they may have very good suggestions or reasons for change.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Millard
>To: council at jabber.org
>Cc: julian at jabber.org; temas at jabber.org
>Sent: 04/04/02 00:13
>Subject: Re: [Council] VOTE: JEP-0011
>
>Peter
>
>I'm "reluctantly" +1 for this change :) with the stipulation that the
>tag
>names should be clearly noted as "deprecated" in the JEP, and all the
>samples should use the category attribute w/ <item> tags.
>
>This would almost make this JEP sort of "informational" and standards
>based.
>
>Does that make sense? I just want to make it clear that moving forward
>things should ALWAYS use the <item> tag.. if thats how the JEP reads
>after
>mod's, then I would be +1. Jer + Julian... can you make these changes
>and we
>can then see where we stand?
>
>DW: What other modifications would you make?
>
>pgm
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Council mailing list
>Council at jabber.org
>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
>






More information about the Council mailing list