Max.Metral at peoplepcHQ.com
Wed Apr 10 13:14:52 CDT 2002
Yes, but by documenting it slightly differently, it might make it better for
whoever needs some different algorithm in the future. Otherwise they think
this can only be used this way.
From: Peter Millard [mailto:me at pgmillard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:01 PM
To: council at jabber.org
Subject: Re: [Council] JEP-0027
You do realize that this is information... so it's just documenting what's
already implemented, right? The existing implementations don't include the
attributes you are suggesting be included.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Metral" <Max.Metral at peoplepchq.com>
To: <council at jabber.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: [Council] JEP-0027
> I'm going out on a limb and saying -1 until this has more detail. In
> addition to what DW said, I wonder if we should have an attribute that
> explicitly identifies the algorithms used for each step, even if it means
> having a default for when the attribute isn't there.
Council mailing list
Council at jabber.org
More information about the Council