[Council] JEP-0023 redux

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed May 8 16:36:02 CDT 2002


OK Mr. Waite, let me know if the changes I've made to JEP-0023 address
your concerns. I added an open issues section as well as a sentence to the
second bullet under Section 1.

http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0023.html

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/

On Tue, 7 May 2002, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> David Waite wrote:
> 
> ******
> 
> -1, I would like to see it explicitly stated that the TTL is only valid 
> within a hop (e.g. TTL is not the total time to live for routing that 
> goes between servers), and is only processed for delayed messages, such 
> as offline messages.
> 
> ******
> 
> If I understand this paragraph correctly, you have two objections:
> 
> 1. The TTL does not represent the total time to live for routing of a
> chunk from the sender to the intended recipient, since multiple hops could
> be required. However, this would seem to require that each hop add its own
> TTL attribute in order to implement the functionality laid out in this
> JEP.
> 
> 2. Are you saying that the TTL *should* be processed only for delayed
> messages, that it *must* be processed only for delayed messages, or
> that right now it *is* processed only for delayed messages (i.e., in
> existing implementations)?
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> 




More information about the Council mailing list