[Council] JEP Roadmap
temas at box5.net
Wed Nov 6 13:41:04 CST 2002
I have to say I'm not so keen on the idea of 100% deferring parts to the
WG. I would much rather see us get at least an idea of where we want to
go and start getting it out there. Some of this stuff is too important
to just skip over for a while. The WG can then better formalize,
hopefully with input from what we've learned.
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:57:54AM +1100, Robert Norris wrote:
> > 29 (JIDs) -- do we have 2 implementations?
> jabberd2 uses the length restrictions defined here, but it doesn't do
> any validation. I don't know whether an implementation should have to
> validate JIDs to be considered compliant.
> > 34 (SASL) -- defer to XMPP WG?
> > 35 (TLS) -- defer to XMPP WG?
> Yes, defer both of these.
> > 44 (namespaces) -- defer to XMPP WG?
> Defer, but note that jabberd2 implements this.
> All the others look fine - I'm looking forward to voting some on this
> Robert Norris GPG: 1024D/FC18E6C2
> Email+Jabber: rob at cataclysm.cx Web: http://cataclysm.cx/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20021106/92ed753d/attachment.pgp
More information about the Council