[Council] namespaces as HTTP URIs
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Oct 7 13:38:46 CDT 2002
OK, I will volunteer for JEP 45 to be the testing ground here. Now, what
is the desired format? I currently have 3 namespaces in there:
Any suggestions on the new namespaces? Here are some possible formats:
Personally I think we might want to use separate version numbers as is
done in XSLT, and not overload names by having gc-owner or whatever. So
I would prefer the following:
Or 'muc' instead of 'gc' to align with the JEP name...
Jabber Software Foundation
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> I think the very recent JEPs should use this, such as MU-Chat, but I
> don't think we need to force it on the slightly older ones that are
> potentially already being played with in clients. As to point 2, yes =)
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:41:41AM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > The sense I got from our meeting the other night is that, going forward,
> > we would prefer all namespace declarations to be URIs (specifically HTTP
> > URIs). So I'm thinking that anything we vote to Draft from now on must
> > express namespaces as http://www.jabber.org/protocol/blah rather than
> > jabber:*:* as we've done until now.
> > Two questions:
> > 1. Shall we enforce this on the JEPs that I will send to the Council soon
> > (server-based privacy rules, feature negotiation, and multi-user chat)?
> > 2. Shall I add something about this to JEP-0001 and the JEP template?
> > My answer is yes to both, but I'd like to get consensus on this from the
> > Council before proceeding.
> > Peter
> > --
> > Peter Saint-Andre
> > Jabber Software Foundation
> > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Council mailing list
> > Council at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
More information about the Council