[Council] VOTE: JEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation)

Joe Hildebrand JHildebrand at jabber.com
Mon Oct 21 11:20:45 CDT 2002


Yes, we decided on these guidelines.  Mostly I just wanted to have this
discussion in public.  :)

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Millard [mailto:me at pgmillard.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 4:42 PM
> To: council at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [Council] VOTE: JEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation)
> 
> 
> Temas speaks for me well in this case :)
> 
> I thought we decided that x:data was great for cases where 
> the schema of the
> data was unknown. But for such a simple case, it seems like 
> we don't need to
> add the xtra layer of abstraction which x-data provides. We 
> know we just
> need to pick options... we know the schema. There is no need 
> for x-data as
> the primary transfer layer.  JoeH and I discussed this at the time wrt
> disco, and I thought we both agreed at that time that this 
> was a reasonable
> rule:
>     - Use x-data if we don't know the type of data or schema 
> which is used
> to present/capture the data.
> 
> pgm.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> 



More information about the Council mailing list