[Council] VOTE: JEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Oct 21 12:37:31 CDT 2002


BTW, votes are still needed on JEP-0020 from:

- DJ Adams
- Ryan Eatmon
- Joe Hildebrand
- Jeremie Miller
- David Waite

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Joe Hildebrand wrote:

> Yes, we decided on these guidelines.  Mostly I just wanted to have this
> discussion in public.  :)
> 
> -- 
> Joe Hildebrand
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Millard [mailto:me at pgmillard.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 4:42 PM
> > To: council at jabber.org
> > Subject: Re: [Council] VOTE: JEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation)
> > 
> > 
> > Temas speaks for me well in this case :)
> > 
> > I thought we decided that x:data was great for cases where 
> > the schema of the
> > data was unknown. But for such a simple case, it seems like 
> > we don't need to
> > add the xtra layer of abstraction which x-data provides. We 
> > know we just
> > need to pick options... we know the schema. There is no need 
> > for x-data as
> > the primary transfer layer.  JoeH and I discussed this at the time wrt
> > disco, and I thought we both agreed at that time that this 
> > was a reasonable
> > rule:
> >     - Use x-data if we don't know the type of data or schema 
> > which is used
> > to present/capture the data.
> > 
> > pgm.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Council mailing list
> > Council at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> 




More information about the Council mailing list