[Council] spring cleaning!
stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Apr 22 10:06:01 CDT 2003
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:10:53PM +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> I'm happy for 21 to be retracted in favour of 60. Or we can vote to
> reject it, whatever.
I take that as a Yes and will change its status accordingly.
> > 3. Rob, do you have plans for your filtering JEPs (62, 63, 64)?
> Not at this time. I mostly wrote them to try to start some discussion
> and get some ideas out there. I don't think there's anything wrong with
> them, but I don't have the motiviation to push them at the moment.
Shall we change them to Deferred, then?
> > 5. Matt, do you have plans for 50 (Ad-Hoc Commands), 70 (Auth via
> > HTTP), and 79 (Message Delivery Semantics)? I think so.
> Again, I'm insterested in 50 and 79.
Seems we need some folks to second temas's sponsorship of 50. :)
> > - 31 (Security Framework) -- seemingly inactive
> I don't know if its that there's no interest in this, or if the required
> knowledge is in short supply (AFAIK it was hard to understand, mostly
> because of the heavy crypto requirements).
Deferred might be appropriate here as well?
> > - 39 (Statistics Gathering) -- ukscone?
> I want to implement this eventually in j2, though I still wonder if it
> should be layered on top of disco in some way (there are numerous
> arguments for and against this, ukscone can probably remember them).
OK, I'll poke ukscone about it.
Jabber Software Foundation
More information about the Council