[Council] VOTE: SOCKS5 Bytestreams

[Peter Saint-Andre]

I've cc'd the other authors so they can reply. I was just the scribe on
this JEP. :)

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, David Waite wrote:

> Quick question (since I know an author is on this list) - can I assume 
> in a Mediated Connection (Setion 3.2) that the mediator can be a real 
> SOCKS proxy? In that case, wouldn't I use my 'real' authentication for 
> that proxy rather than the dynamically generated keypair? Or is it not 
> possible to use an off-the-shelf SOCKS proxy for this purpose?
> 
> -David Waite
> 
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> >We discussed the SOCKS5 Bytestreams proposal (JEP-0065) in the most recent
> >Council meeting and no Council members had objections. Therefore I would
> >like to present this JEP for a vote of the Council. Because this is a
> >Standards-Track JEP, a +1 vote means you approve of advancing this to
> >Draft. Please vote or voice your objections on the list.
> >
> >http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0065.html
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Peter
> >
> >--
> >Peter Saint-Andre
> >Jabber Software Foundation
> >http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Council mailing list
> >Council at jabber.org
> >http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
>