[Council] VOTE: JEP-0013 (Flexible Offline Message Retrieval)

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Jul 14 13:29:57 CDT 2003

Gah, all the recent noise on the lists and my sickness made me forget to
read this.  Just went over it and I'm +1 once Joe's concerns are

As to #3, I agree it can be opaque unless we're trying to give the node
name some meaning, but that doesn't seem to make sense when we already
stamp offlined msgs.


On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:20, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> Sorry.. I was hoping someone else was going to nitpick this one.
> 1) There are no error codes specfified.  
> - disco#items, no such node
> - disco#items, unauthorized (both of these are probably in disco)
> - view, no such node
> - view, unauthorized
> - delete, no such node
> - delete, unauthorized
> 2) Security considerations: Server MUST NOT deliver offline messages to
> others.  (except MAYbe for admins)
> 3) Why is the syntax of the node attribute specified?  Can it just be
> opaque?

More information about the Council mailing list