[Council] File Xfer Call for Arbitration

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Jul 21 12:15:33 CDT 2003


I'll have comments by EOW.  Discussing some outstanding issues.  Of
course I'm fully biased in this issue =)

--temas


On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 16:08, Ryan Eatmon wrote:
> Any others thoughts fellow Council people?
> 
> 
> Peter G. Millard wrote:
> > Ryan Eatmon wrote:
> > 
> >>In all other respects, the two methodologies are almost identical.
> >>Any thoughts from other Council folk?
> > 
> > 
> > I agree with your conclusions.. I really like having the "profile" method
> > for allowing whatever meta-data needs to be sent. It seems more flexible
> > than the other combinations. I also agree that we don't really need (nor
> > should we have) this idea of auto-failover. The state machine for sending
> > and receiving is already complex enough without adding more complexity to
> > the mix.
> > 
> > pgm.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Council mailing list
> > Council at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
> 




More information about the Council mailing list