[Council] does size matter?

[Joe Hildebrand]

I'm not sure that changing the number of of members is going to have a
direct effect on nimbleness, now that we have the timeout and quorum rules.

But 5 or 7 sound fine to me.  Odd is good, obviously.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Millard [mailto:me at pgmillard.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:44 PM
> To: council at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [Council] does size matter?
> 
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > What do you guys think is the ideal size of the Council? 
> Personally I 
> > think 9 might be too big. 5? 7?
> 
> 5 may be too small IMO, but I agree that 9 seems too big... 7 
> seems like a nice sweet spot IMO, but I could definitly live 
> with 5. Being more "agile" == good.
> 
> pgm.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council
>