[Council] 77 and 78
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Jun 16 15:11:48 CDT 2003
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:00:37PM -0600, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
== 78 (auth) :)
> Security considerations: this method may be used (MAY?) I think it should
> still be possible to use this approach with 1.0, if configured in by both
> sides, but it SHOULD NOT be.
What does 1.0 mean at that point?
> Also, there are two paragraphs about plaintext here. I like the latter one,
> except for s/If a client attempts to use the plaintext mechanism/If a client
> implements the plaintext mechanism/.
Yes, there are two paragraphs. First is about implementing the protocol
in software. Second is about actually using what is implemented. These
are two different things, no?
== 77 (reg)
> I still don't like this: If the entity is already registered, the IQ result
> MUST contain an empty <registered/> element (indicating that the entity is
> already registered). It SHOULD NOT contain instructions and empty
> registration fields; instead, it SHOULD contain the registration information
> currently on file for the entity.
> I still think it SHOULD contain empty elements and instructions, so that I
> can change my registration information.
Ah, I didn't understand the motivation before. Well, the existing
protocol is to provide the current information, along with instructions.
Hmm. Let me look some more.
More information about the Council