[Council] 77 and 78
JHildebrand at jabber.com
Mon Jun 16 15:40:49 CDT 2003
> > 77:
> == 78 (auth) :)
DWIM. Thanks. :)
> > Security considerations: this method may be used (MAY?) I think it
> > should still be possible to use this approach with 1.0, if
> > in by both sides, but it SHOULD NOT be.
> What does 1.0 mean at that point?
Sorry. XMPP 1.0/SASL. If your server implements both SASL and iq/auth, you
should be able to use iq/auth if you like. I'll probably be implementing
that in the telnet client upon occasion, anyway. :)
There really ought to be a stream:feature for it though....
> > Also, there are two paragraphs about plaintext here. I like the
> > latter one, except for s/If a client attempts to use the plaintext
> > mechanism/If a client implements the plaintext mechanism/.
> Yes, there are two paragraphs. First is about implementing
> the protocol in software. Second is about actually using what
> is implemented. These are two different things, no?
Let's say it's confusing at best. I'd like to be able to have a client
implement plaintext if they want to over SSL/TLS, without violating a SHOULD
More information about the Council