[Council] Resolving the file transfer debate

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Jun 30 12:12:51 CDT 2003

I disagree about IBB, it needs to come through, and I do feel it's
pretty much ready.


On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 12:05, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> My take is this:
> The solution is 95+96, with SOCKS5 Bytestreams as the main method and
> HTTP (DAV + OOB) as the fallback. I see no reason at that point to use
> IBB. We just need a stable public DAV server for use by the Jabber
> community when s5b proxies are not available.
> And 52 will not be reverted to and older version without agreement by
> all of the authors.
> And temas, I appreciate all your work on this.
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council

More information about the Council mailing list