[Council] Experimental JEP Implementations

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Wed May 7 17:44:02 CDT 2003

On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 17:07, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I've just added some code to jep.xsl that spits out a nice red warning
> at the top of every standards-track JEP that is experimental. That
> should scare people off. ;)

Purty, I don't know if there's anything else we should do, but there is
still the namespace debate.

> > http://jabber.org/protocol/spec/1.0
> > http://jabber.org/protocol/spec/2.0
> This is probably a good idea but it's a change. :) Do the revision
> numbers track the JEP revision numbers? What is the expected behavior
> when two applications are using different versions? Etc. I'll have to
> chew on this, I guess.

I would say, yes it tracks the revision numbers, but only the draft
numbers, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, etc, etc.  That saves us from dealing a lot with
different versions between apps.


More information about the Council mailing list