[Council] Tomorrows Meeting

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Could we also continue with the review of outstanding JEPs? I'd like to
finish the cleanup process if possible. I'd especially like to see if we
can move forward with JEP-0-083 (Nested Roster Groups) and JEP-0106 (JID 
Escaping) since they seem fairly uncontroversial.

FYI, I've just changed JEPs 43 and 74 (Justin Kirby's JEPs) to a status
of Retracted.

In other news, I plan to update the "extended presence" JEPs to use
metadata, once I fix JEP-0120. This will affect JEPs 80, 107, 108, and
118.

/psa

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:03:30PM -0500, Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> I know I previously mentioned we might want to discuss encryption at 
> tomorrows meeting, but that's changed.  It's come to my attention, from 
> talking with many of the council members and other JSF members, that 
> there is a gross misunderstanding of what informational is intended 
> for, and how many JEPs should be informational.  Really, I feel this 
> breaks down into what standards track is really for, and that's a major 
> decision that has to be made.  So, the majority of our meeting will be 
> devoted to that tomorrow.  Think hard, read JEP-1 and I also believe 
> some other council members may post some of their thoughts before the 
> meeting.  I'll have an agenda for the meeting up tomorrow.
> 
> --temas