[Council] proto-JEP: Message Archiving
me at pgmillard.com
Fri Apr 30 12:50:35 CDT 2004
Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> The last piece I would like to suggest is that we have
> a partial guideline to what receives a number. So far the simple
> suggestion seems to be, at least some backing from the community and it
> has been technically thought out. What this causes is young or single
> idea JEPs to be pushed back, and it also causes messy JEPs to be pushed
> back. Both of those are what are generally the dead JEPs right now.
> So it seems like that would work well. Others?
I also agree w/ the comments previously expressed by temas & LW.. The process of
mandating some "backing" and technical thought seems to be fine requirements for
getting a JEP number. I agree, that these JEP's that come out of (seemingly)
no-where often are suspect and need some time to be fleshed out. I also agree
that this is what the wiki is for.
I'm wondering if these vague requirements are sufficient, or is the community
going to need/want something more quantitative?
More information about the Council