[Council] proto-JEP: Stream Acks

Peter Millard me at pgmillard.com
Tue Aug 10 14:20:28 CDT 2004


Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> I second this objection, and agree with all of LW's comments.

I third the objection.. it clearly goes against the protocol development
guidelines provided in JEP-134

I have serious issues with the addition of SEVERAL new top-level elements. It
seems that no thought about re-usability was given when approaching this
problem. We already have JEP-22 and AMP that address some of these issues.

pgm.




More information about the Council mailing list