[Council] proto-JEP: Stream Acks

[Ryan Eatmon]

I fourth the objection even though I'm not on the council...  I mean 
come on...  This could have easily been done via disco, and an X packet...


Peter Millard wrote:
> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> 
>>I second this objection, and agree with all of LW's comments.
> 
> 
> I third the objection.. it clearly goes against the protocol development
> guidelines provided in JEP-134
> 
> I have serious issues with the addition of SEVERAL new top-level elements. It
> seems that no thought about re-usability was given when approaching this
> problem. We already have JEP-22 and AMP that address some of these issues.
> 
> pgm.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/council

-- 
Ryan Eatmon
reatmon at jabber.org