[Council] JEP-0077?

[Matthew A. Miller]

I hadn't noticed the update, and now I know why (-:

Since my concerns have not yet been addressed, my vote is still -1:

*  Section 5 seems to imply that x:data is used instead of the built-in 
iq:register fields.  If this is the intent, it needs to be explicitly 
stated.  If this is not the intent, then I would like that section to 
contain language explicitly stating what takes presence (x:data form or 
iq:register fields).

*  Section 6 implies that x:oob is used instead of the iq:register 
fields.  I would like this to be explicitly stated.


-  LW

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Some time ago, I posted a new version of JEP-0077 (In-Band
> Registration), which was intended to address the concerns
> expressed by the Council. Is version 1.4 of that document
> acceptable to those who voted -1 (Matt Miller and Thomas
> Muldowney)?
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0077.html
> 
> If the Council does not complete voting on this JEP by the
> first of September (when the 2004-2005 Council is chosen
> by the members of the JSF), the next Council will need to
> consider this JEP instead.
> 
> Peter
>