[Council] Moving JEPs Forward
Matthew A. Miller
linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Tue Feb 3 05:58:18 CST 2004
Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> JEP-0018: Invisible Presence
It would be nice if more server implementations existed that supported
privacy lists before JEP-0018 goes away, but that's pending still under
some discussion in XMPP-IM, and those servers and clients that do
support this don't implement the same way anyway.
In the end, I'm fine with this going Obsolete before privacy lists (and
therefore JEP-0126) are done.
> JEP-0033: Packet Headers
Not-so-recent discussions with Mr. Hildebrand made it sound like this
was changing to only cover alternative/additional addressing. I'm also
bothered by this JEP now relying on something that has yet to be agreed
to, and is in fact still radically changing.
I'll ask Joe if its possible to have the meta-data portion be its own
thing (possibly a JEP?). For me, that makes this JEP a little easier to
More information about the Council