[Council] VOTE: JEP-0133 (Service Administration)
Matthew A. Miller
linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Mon Nov 29 08:34:23 CST 2004
Agreed. If we do it for MUC and pubsub, we should do it here, too.
Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> Only thing that is jumping out at me is related to FORM_TYPE. All of
> the FORM_TYPE entries use the same namespace which is kind of annoying
> because it means you have to go back a step to the command node
> attribute to get a more true definition of what form is being filled
> out. From looking over the FORM_TYPE JEP and other FORM_TYPE users
> (pubsub and muc) I would say this is probably wrong and we need a more
> complete FORM_TYPE for each separate form. Yay/nay?
> On Nov 17, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I fixed one field name (see version 0.5), so I'm now +1.
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 10:16:21PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> The Last Call for JEP-0133 (Service Administration) has ended with
>>> only one comment, which the JEP author has addressed by adding some
>>> additional defining text. Therefore it seems appropriate to vote on
>>> advancing this informational JEP to a status of Active.
>> Council mailing list
>> Council at jabber.org
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
More information about the Council