[Council] VOTE: JEP-0133 (Service Administration)

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Mon Nov 29 08:34:23 CST 2004


Agreed.  If we do it for MUC and pubsub, we should do it here, too.


-  LW

Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> Only thing that is jumping out at me is related to FORM_TYPE.  All of 
> the FORM_TYPE entries use the same namespace which is kind of annoying 
> because it means you have to go back a step to the command node 
> attribute to get a more true definition of what form is being filled 
> out.  From looking over the FORM_TYPE JEP and other FORM_TYPE users 
> (pubsub and muc) I would say this is probably wrong and we need a more 
> complete FORM_TYPE for each separate form.  Yay/nay?
> 
> --temas
> 
> 
> On Nov 17, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> I fixed one field name (see version 0.5), so I'm now +1.
>>
>> /psa
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 10:16:21PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>> The Last Call for JEP-0133 (Service Administration) has ended with
>>> only one comment, which the JEP author has addressed by adding some
>>> additional defining text. Therefore it seems appropriate to vote on
>>> advancing this informational JEP to a status of Active.
>>>
>>> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0133.html
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Council mailing list
>> Council at jabber.org
>> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/council


More information about the Council mailing list