[Council] VOTE: JEP-0072 (SOAP Over XMPP)

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Mon Nov 29 16:10:16 CST 2004


 From talking with DW, closest I could get to someone that seems to know 
SOAP quickly, the current spec would fit with SOAP 1.1 but is pretty 
far off for 1.2.  Here's another link to consider:

http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-email

It's the somewhat official binding for SOAP via email.

--temas


On Nov 29, 2004, at 3:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Furthermore, I'm reviewing the SOAP specifications in more detail and 
> it
> appears that we need to define how JEP-0072 meets the requirements for
> SOAP protocol bindings in Section 4 of SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/#transpbindframew
>
> An example (for HTTP) is here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#soapinhttp
>
> At a minimum, this is something we need to complete before we are ready
> for an informal W3c review. So I will work to add this (in consultation
> with JEP author Fabio Forno) soon.
>
> Given the scope of changes required, I'm changing my vote to -1 and I
> think we should discuss remanding this JEP back to Experimental while
> we add the necessary information to JEP-0072 and seek an informal W3C
> review before it proceeds to Draft (as we did with JEP-0071). I'll add
> that to the agenda for this week's meeting.
>
> Peter
>
> Section 4
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:49:33PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I have contacted the activity lead for the W3C Web Services Activity
>> about this matter.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:26:22PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Well, as we did with JEP-0071 (XHTML), I could seek out a reviewer 
>>> from
>>> among the editors of the SOAP 1.2 spec. It seems appropriate to 
>>> follow
>>> the same process with this JEP as we did with XHTML, since both specs
>>> re-use W3C Recommendations. That will introduce a delay, but it's 
>>> better
>>> to get it right the first time.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:37:22PM -0600, Thomas Muldowney wrote:
>>>> This is a hard one for me to vote on since I know next to nothing 
>>>> about
>>>> SOAP.  Is there anyone that knows SOAP really well that could look 
>>>> this
>>>> over and post to council?  I feel kind of blind on this one.
>>>>
>>>> --temas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 10, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've reviewed this again, as a result of which I fixed a few small
>>>>> errors in the text and updated a reference or two. I'm now +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> /psa
>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Council mailing list
> Council at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/council



More information about the Council mailing list