[Council] Advancing more XEPs to Final

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Dec 1 14:10:31 CST 2006

Chris Mullins wrote:
> I'm happy to propose and accept a definition like that.
> The thing that I don't like is the huge number of "stable" XEP's that we
> have (and depend on) that are not in a state that reflects this. 
> It's hard for me to get in front of a group and evangelize features like
> MUC, and when asked, "What status is that standard in?" to reply with
> "draft".

Send them to http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html and ask them if they
use any of the Proposed or Draft standards.

However, I agree that it would be good to move some more stable
standards to Final.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20061201/0fe1e3c5/smime.bin

More information about the Council mailing list