[Council] Advancing more XEPs to Final

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Dec 5 16:21:21 CST 2006

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Ian Paterson wrote:
>> Chris Mullins wrote:
>>> I was looking at the (very short) list of standards-track XEPS that
>>> are in final status, and thought it’s time to perhaps advance a few more.
>> IMHO that depends on what Final means. Putting to one side for a moment
>> what it means within the XSF today, I'd like Final to mean "no backwards
>> incompatible changes will be introduced" (and perhaps even that "the
>> schema MAY be extended"). Not final in the sense that there would be
>> absolutely no material changes (only clarifications).
> Agreed.

My proposed modifications to address these points are here:


CVS diff:



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20061205/19027666/smime.bin

More information about the Council mailing list