[Council] meeting agenda, 2007-06-25

[Peter Saint-Andre]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:43:56PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 22:28, Chris Mullins wrote:
> >If everyone runs out and implements PEP (which will likley happen if
> >it's put in there) and then we discover issues with the spec, then  
> >those
> >issues can't really be addressed as the deployed base is too large.
> 
> Well, since now PEP /is/ pubsub, I don't see a problem if 60 is  
> considered stable enough in saying 163 is stable enough.

Right.

But I think only the REQUIRED specs will be "tested" as part of the
compliance process anyway.

Naturally we could remove all recommended specs from the compliance
levels.

> PEP's been in there since May 22nd, so with one day left until our  
> deadline for going final, I don't think this is the ideal time to be  
> pulling it back out again if we can possibly avoid it, it's been  
> through last call and not had complaints that I remember.

None that I saw.

Perhaps Ralph and Ian have opinions in the matter as well?

Peter