[Council] meeting minutes, 2008-01-30

Ralph Meijer jabberfoundation at ralphm.ik.nu
Sat Feb 9 04:09:16 CST 2008


On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:21 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Results of the XMPP Council meeting held 2008-01-30...
>
> [..]
>
> 3. XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities
> 
> Approve version 1.5pre18?
> 
> Dave and Peter +1.
> 
> Ian, Ralph, and Kev to post to the list soon. Peter shall pester them
> relentlessly until they vote. :)

Oh, and he did. +1

> [..]
>
> 5. XEP-0080: User Geolocation
> 
> Approve version 1.5pre1?
> 
> Dave, Ian, Peter, and Kevin +1.
> 
> Peter to change element name from velocity to speed.

+1

> 6. XEP-0078: Non-SASL Authentication
> 
> Approve version 2.4pre1?
> 
> Dave, Ian, Peter, and Kevin +1.

+1

> 7. XEP-0118: User Tune
> 
> Approve version 1.2pre1?
> 
> Dave, Ian, Peter, and Kevin +1.
> 
> Dave raised the question of compatibility with the related SIMPLE I-D.
> Peter pointed out that the SIMPLE I-D pretty much tracks the XMPP work,
> but also addresses topics we cover in XEP-0196, XEP-0197, etc. Peter to
> review the SIMPLE I-D and report back.

-1. As I mentioned in the thread on standards at xmpp.org, I question
whether data related to the listening experience (such as rating),
belongs in this specification.

> 8. ProtoXEP: Data Element
> 
> Consensus to publish as a XEP.
> 
> 9. ProtoXEP: Use of Domain-Based Service Names in XMPP SASL Negotiation
> 
> Consensus to publish as a XEP.
> 
> 10. ProtoXEP: Service Discovery Notifications
> 
> Consensus to publish as a XEP.
> 
> 11. ProtoXEP: Software Information
> 
> Consensus to publish as a XEP.
> 
> 12. ProtoXEP: User Bleg
> 
> Consensus to keep discussing on the list, but not to publish yet.
> 
> 13. ProtoXEP: XMPP Protocol Flows for Inter-Domain Federation
> 
> Consensus to issue a "standing order" for the Editor to publish this
> once a complete first draft is ready.
> 
> 14. ProtoXEP: Jingle File Transfer
> 
> Consensus to keep discussing on the list, but not to publish yet.

+1 to go with the consensus.

> 15. Any objections to using urn:xmpp:tmp:* for namespaces in
> Experimental XEPs?
> 
> None.

No objection here, either.

> [..]

-- 
Groetjes,

ralphm



More information about the Council mailing list