[Council] meeting minutes, 2008-10-15

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Oct 28 10:25:31 CDT 2008

Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Mon Oct 27 21:13:36 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Joe and I discussed it offlist. We think that if the naive subscriber
>> doesn't include subscription options, the queueing node needs to return
>> a <not-acceptable/> error with a pubsub-specific condition of
>> <configuration-required/>. In fact this is already specified:
>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-queueing.html#example-1
>> So a naive client will never get subscribed to a queueing node in the
>> first place.
> Ah, okay. In that case, that would seem to be the major area of interop
> failure gone, so I'm okay with this in principle.
> I'll admit I'm not convinced, yet, that this is the right approach for
> queueing, but it does at least appear not to cause damage, so I have no
> objections.

Did I say I was convinced? :) I think it is an approach worth exploring.
Alternative approaches are welcome...


Peter Saint-Andre

More information about the Council mailing list