[Council] Agenda 20100301

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Mar 1 09:55:12 CST 2010

On 3/1/10 12:40 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> 1. Will the Council ever finish its vote on XEP-0060 version 1.13 and
>> XEP-0163 version 1.2? Kevin has voted +1 but votes are still needed from
>> everyone else. This is starting to get silly. Forget the diffs, Council
>> members could have read each spec backwards and forwards by now. Which
>> is probably a good idea anyway.
> Ralph has voted -1 on 0060. I was assuming that everyone else was dnv
> - it's been months.

I'm looking forward to Ralph's comments in the standards@ thread about
IQ-based notifications. :)

>> 2. A vote is in progress on version 1.1 of XEP-0237 (Roster Versioning).
>> Kevin, Matthew, and Ralph have voted +1 already. Votes are still needed
>> from Dave and Remko.
> The 10day window's up on that, too.

I wonder if we want to align http://xmpp.org/council/policies.shtml with
the 14-day windows that are common in XEP-0001 (revised edition).

>> 3. Version 0.3 of XEP-0227 (Portable Import/Export Format for XMPP-IM
>> Servers) is ready for advancement to Draft, according to the authors.
> I missed that one, sorry.

No worries.

>> 4. There are two proposals in the inbox: Server IP Check and Jingle
>> Nodes. No objections expressed in the last meeting by Kevin, Matthew,
>> and Ralph.
> Ten days was up on that one, too.


>>> 3)   XEP-0047: In-Band Bytestreams
>>> Version: 1.3rc1
>>> Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0047/diff/1.2/vs/1.3rc1
>>> Accept changes??
>> There is still some discussion on the standards@ list.
> OK.
>> A patch has been submitted for XEP-0136 to address issues raised on the
>> standards@ list. IMHO this would be ready for a vote at the next meeting.
> As in...today?

As in next week or the week after.

>> The Council might take a look at the Draft XEPs and consider if any
>> others are ready for possible advancement to Final. It's been a while
>> since we had a Call for Experience. :) Possible candidates include:
>> 1. XEP-0047 and XEP-0065 after the next round of edits.
>> 2. XEP-0066.
>> 3. XEP-0124 and XEP-0206 (although there is a feature request logged
>> against the latter in the new issue tracker).
> Ok.

Just something to think about. Perhaps we can move some of those forward
by the end of this Council term...


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100301/51a0b7f8/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Council mailing list