[Council] consistency of review periods

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Mar 8 09:57:36 CST 2010

On 3/8/10 8:22 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> I think it would be easier if we make all of these periods 14 days
>> (unless otherwise stated by the Editor).
> I'm happy with this.


>> And we probably also need the
>> Editor to be more explicit about start times for Council votes -- I
>> think currently we assume that voting starts at the meeting during which
>> an item is introduced, but it would be good to be clear about that.
> As we've said elsewhere, I'm happy for the Council Chair to start
> sending out mails where voting periods start (and weren't completed
> within the meeting).

I have a slight preference for an email to the list whose subject is
something like "VOTE: XEP-0060 v1.13" because the email can be dated and
I don't pay much attention to something unless it's pushed to me. But I
suppose we could vote via Jira and have it send a message to the list.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100308/0e0db796/attachment.bin>

More information about the Council mailing list