[Council] XEP-198 1.2 proxy vote

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Mar 2 12:49:09 CST 2011

On 3/2/11 11:41 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote:
>> What do the Council members think? Dave and I are just lowly spec
>> authors. ;-)
> +1
> My issue involved confusion on the "H" attribute, and reset of it
> being out of synch between server and client.  I originally thought
> that this could happen easily, but now I do not believe that it can.

OK, good.

> Dave and I discussed it at length, and the only edge cases we came up
> with involved not acking for 2^32 stanzas (which a stream server would
> probably not be able to deal with in supporting this feature anyway)
> or a stream server sending 2^32 stanzas while the client is
> disconnected (which is probably impossible on a TCP connection).

Yes, those cases seem extremely unlikely, perhaps even impossible
(although I hesitate to use that word!).

Since Nathan had the initial concern, I'll take this issue as closed
unless another Council complains vociferously, then push out the updated
spec tonight.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110302/2daaa5c0/attachment.bin>

More information about the Council mailing list