[Council] XEP-198 1.2 proxy vote

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Mar 2 12:49:09 CST 2011


On 3/2/11 11:41 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote:
>> What do the Council members think? Dave and I are just lowly spec
>> authors. ;-)
> 
> +1
> 
> My issue involved confusion on the "H" attribute, and reset of it
> being out of synch between server and client.  I originally thought
> that this could happen easily, but now I do not believe that it can.

OK, good.

> Dave and I discussed it at length, and the only edge cases we came up
> with involved not acking for 2^32 stanzas (which a stream server would
> probably not be able to deal with in supporting this feature anyway)
> or a stream server sending 2^32 stanzas while the client is
> disconnected (which is probably impossible on a TCP connection).

Yes, those cases seem extremely unlikely, perhaps even impossible
(although I hesitate to use that word!).

Since Nathan had the initial concern, I'll take this issue as closed
unless another Council complains vociferously, then push out the updated
spec tonight.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110302/2daaa5c0/attachment.bin>


More information about the Council mailing list